Conversion Crawl Classes 11: 3rd Edition D&D: The Forge of Fury

When Wizards of the Coast purchased D&D, they created an Open Gaming License allowing third-party content creators to produce and sell products for Dungeons & Dragons. This was a brilliant move which revitalized the brand, although there has been some controversy surrounding the OGL from 4th edition onward. The purpose of this post is not to discuss the OGL though, and this intro merely serves to illustrate why there is so much material created for this version of the game. All of it is, of course, convertible to Dungeon Crawl Classics. Of course, The Forge of Fury is an official WotC adventure.

There are some things to keep in mind. First off, 3e has a steeper power curve than DCC. While a 2nd level DCC character might be roughly equivalent to a 4th level character in 3e, the jump between levels in 3e means that an encounter designed for PCs even one level lower might be disinteresting, while an encounter one level higher might be deadly indeed! Combine this with an expectation that characters will gain levels during an adventure, and there is a real incentive for 3e adventure writers to control the order in which encounters occur.

Melan wrote an interesting article about the route choices available to players in various adventures, including The Forge of Fury and some we have looked at in the Conversion Crawl Classes series of posts. He amply demonstrated the more linear nature of 3e adventures compared to those which came before. I believe this is an artifact of the factors described above…but it still poses the question when converting: Do we want to modify the map? I don’t think there is a problem with some adventures being more linear than others, and I don’t see a major need to modify this map, but as the 3e era goes on, some examples of linear maps arise which I would never use without major modifications.

Most of the creatures in this adventure are already in the core rulebook. Others, such as the roper, can be found on my blog. Finally, Reddit user Quetzalcoatlsghost did a basic conversion of all of the creatures in the 3e SRD.  He then invited you to log in and create variants. Indeed, there is a plethora of riches to help with conversion here! In fact, so much groundwork has been provided that the difficulty involved in conversion is making certain that the outcome feels more like DCC, and less like generic D&D, than the original.

All The Stuff in the World

3rd Edition supplied you with statblocks for things you didn’t know you needed statblocks for. In DCC, for many of these, you can use them with small changes or ignore them altogether. Do you need a base DC for a water-swollen door, or will the DC 5/10/15/20 rule of thumb in the core rulebook cover this issue for you?

Tastes vary, but to my mind, this is more information than you need:

Iron Door: 2 1/2 in. thick; hardness 13; hp 75; AC 5; break DC 28.

For DCC something like this is probably sufficient, with the general assumption that the judge is aware that bashing through an iron door will take a lot of work, if it is even possible. In the 3e version, “hardness” means that the door ignores the first 13 hp damage from any attack, so the door is probably not going to be bashed in with weapons anyway. Nor do you really need an AC to target a stationary object like this – it is not as though you want to wade through fumbles and critical hits (which are probably not appropriate anyway) in a yawn-fest of dice rolling. 3e wanted you to realize you weren’t going to bash through the door by looking at its stats, but those stats are DM-facing anyway. You have the same result, for practical purposes, by merely writing:

Iron door (Strength DC 28).

3rd Edition era trap stats are largely usable as is, although again minor tweaking might yield better results. Consider:

Poison Gas Trap: CR 2; poison gas creates a 20-foot cone, initial Strength damage of 1d4 points, secondary Strength damage of 1d4 points; Fort save negates all (DC 13), second save negates secondary damage (DC 13); Search (DC 23); Disable Device (DC 13).

In DCC, we might strengthen the poison to 1d4 Strength plus Fort DC 13 or an additional 1d4 Strength each round until the save succeeds. Overall, though, the traps in this adventure do not require any form of major modification. It is important to remember that numbers don’t inflate in DCC the way they do in 3e, so a DC 23 Reflex save (for instance) might be reduced to DC 15. Likewise, some of the skill checks to find and disable traps can be reduced to more closely match the examples in the core rules. A good rule of thumb for easy conversion is to take any DC over 10 and halve the portion above 10. So, DC 20 becomes DC 15. If the result seems off to you, adjust up or down (as I did with the DC 23 Reflex save) until you like the result.

Treasure, Treasure, and More Treasure

The general rules discussed in earlier posts still applies. Monetary treasures can be reduced to 10%, unnecessary magic items can be removed or turned into interesting mundane items. If we are going to keep magic items, most of them can be made more interesting. We can look at four examples.

Treasure: The orcs on patrol chose to take most of their wealth with them, but a loose stone on the south wall conceals a sack of 250 sp, 40 gp, and a potion of cure light wounds. Yarrack conceals a sack of gold in area 8, since he feels certain he would be murdered by his followers if they ever learned where he kept his treasure.

In this case, we can turn this into 250 cp, 40 sp, and we might as well keep the potion. In this case, we can say that it provides 1 HD of healing, and give it some details like a translucent red color and a taste mixing cinnamon and chili peppers.

Treasure: On the floor of the stirge cave lies the desiccated corpse of a dwarven explorer who died here many years ago. A leather pouch on the corpse contains 35 gp and a wand of light with 20 charges remaining.

In this case, we can turn the gold to silver and remove the wand. 35 gp isn’t the largest payday in the world, so we could leave the coins untouched if we wished, or mix them (as in 5 gp and 30 sp).

Treasure: Snurrevin has found a little loot in his explorations of the Foundry; in the cold forge in the northwest corner of the room, he has stashed 320 gp, 1,100 sp, a gold necklace set with ruby stones worth 900 gp, and a potion of strength.

One of the things that I like about these write-ups is that we are told why the treasure is there. However, in DCC terms, this is not “a little loot”! We can change the 320 gp to silver, the sp to copper, and then reduce the value of the necklace. While 900 gp is too high, 90 gp seems to low to me – we can set the value at 120 gp.

Finally, we have the potion of strength. One-shot items like potions (and scrolls, sometimes at least) are useful to include in adventures while having no long-term effect on campaign play. I am inclined to leave the potion in, and define it as granting a +3 bonus to all Strength-based rolls (including attack and damage rolls) for 1d5 turns. Lets make it a viscous black liquid that nonetheless flows like oil and tastes like treacle.

Treasure: Another member of the expedition that perished here decades ago lies in this room. (Her companions can be found in area 15 and area 42.) This was the party’s thief; her desiccated corpse lies half-buried under wrecked furniture. A masterwork scimitar is clutched in her hand, and a pouch at her belt contains 670 sp.

As an easy fix, we can reduce the silver to 67 pieces. Bandits use scimitars in the core rulebook doing 1d8 damage, so the masterwork scimitar is treated as a long sword, but does 1d10 damage based on its quality (+1d on the dice chain). A normal longsword is worth 10 gp; we can say this masterwork version is worth 15 gp. We could go as high as 25 gp, if you want your players to face a real choice between using it and selling it!

Converting Monster Statblocks

Creatures like orcs and troglodytes in the adventure can be made mysterious, as previously discussed.  The adventure includes a dragon, and we have also discussed converting dragons to DCC. Although the system has changed, the methodology has not.

I have a soft spot for gricks. I think they are one of the better monsters created for the 3e Monster Manual, and as they appear in The Forge of Fury, they will serve as our example monster here. As a side note, one of the things I really dislike in WotC-era adventures is monster stats being grouped together at the back of the book rather than appearing where encountered in an adventure. Ironic, I know, since at least one publisher has made the same decision regarding one of my own adventures. When a monster is encountered, it is so much better to have the stats at hand rather than having to flip through an adventure to find them!

In any event, gricks appear in the adventure text as follows:

Grick: CR 3; Medium-size aberration; HD 2d8; hp 9 (average); Init +2 (Dex); Spd 30 ft., climb 20 ft.; AC 16; Atk +3 melee (1d4+2, 4 tentacles), –2 melee (bite 1d3+1); SQ Scent, damage reduction 15/+1; AL N; SV Fort +0, Ref +2, Will +5; Str 14, Dex 14, Con 11, Int 3, Wis 14, Cha 5.

Skills and Feats: Climb +10, Hide +4 (+12 camouflage), Listen +7, Spot +7; Alertness.

I am also going to include the conversion Quetzalcoatlsghost did here, to provide a basis for comparison. I hope that what follows doesn’t lead to changes in the main source, although I would also hope that my version could be included under the variants tab (there were no variant gricks at the time of this writing). Quetzalcoatlsghost’s version is:

Grick

Size/Type            Medium Aberration

Alignment           Neutral

Hit Dice                 2d8 (9 HP)

Initiative              +1

Move                   30 ft. (6 squares), climb 20 ft.

Armor Class        16

Action Dice         4d20

Attack Bonus       +2

Attack                   4 tentacles +2 melee (1d4+2); bite -2 melee (1d3+1)

Abilities                Strength: 14 ( +1 ), Agility: 14 ( +1 ), Stamina: 11 ( +0 ), Personality: 3 ( -3 )

Saves                    Fort: +0 , Ref: +1 , Will: +0

Special Properties           

Let’s break that down using the DCC statblock formula:

Init: The original statblock grants a +2 bonus; the revised statblock grants a +1 bonus. The change is based on the values given for stat bonuses between 3e and DCC (Dexterity 14 vs. Agility 14). However, I am going to grant the thing the full +2 bonus because I am hoping it will have a chance to act before it dies. Petty of me, I know. Also, it just feels right.

Atk: The original’s tentacles +3 melee (1d4+2) or bite –2 melee (bite 1d3+1) as expressed in DCC terms are usable…but unless we want to give our monster 5 action dice, why would it ever choose to bite? Let’s increase bite damage to 1d6+1.

AC: We are now converting ascending AC to ascending AC, so we could just use AC 16. We don’t want our DCC combats to drag the way some 3e ones do, so we will be very careful about pairing high ACs with high hit points. It is often useful to make DCC creatures a little harder to hit, but reducing their Hit Dice so that hits matter. The easiest conversion is to simply use number the given but in some cases it is worth adjusting an easy conversion up or down to better meet your vision of a creature. In this case, AC 16 is fine.

HD: Both original monster and conversion use 2d8 for an average of 9 hit points. That is, again, fine and requires no change.

Hp: We are not going to include hit points in our statblock this time, because we are not converting a specific individual. However, I am going to recommend rolling hit points to get the full gamut of 2 to 16 hp. Sometimes using an average number works, especially when facing masses of humanoids, but for less gregarious monsters we can treat them as individuals. We can also consider choosing hit points rather than rolling if we know what we want, but rolling can sometimes create a surprising encounter and should be encouraged.

MV: In DCC terms, 30’ or climb 20’. There is no reason to alter the original.

Act: The original monster had five attacks (four tentacles plus a bite). By giving the judge a reason to consider using the bite instead of a tentacle, we have provided a good reason to reduce this to 4d20, as Quetzalcoatlsghost did.

SP: The grick has scent and damage reduction 15/+1 listed as special qualities. We need to keep scent in some way because gricks don’t have eyes, and can presumably be “blinded” by strong odors. Instead of damage reduction, we can just say they take half damage from non-magical weapons. This makes them slightly more vulnerable, but magical weapons are also less common in DCC.

When we look at the “Skills and Feats” section of the statblock, we also see “Hide +4 (+12 camouflage)”, so we can grant our version a +10 bonus to stealth checks.

SV: The original version has Fort +0, Ref +2, Will +5. DCC was built using the same core three-save system, which should help with conversion. Quetzalcoatlsghost reduced these to Fort +0, Ref +1, Will: +0, but I am inclined to go with the original. I am guessing that the reduction was based on the changes in ability score bonuses between editions, but I don’t find anything in the original that seems wrong to me.

A lot of conversion is really deciding what seems right or wrong to the individual doing the converting. You can have formulae which help with the base work, but even then the original monster might seem wildly different stat-wise than how you picture it from the text. This is an issue that rises regularly while converting materials, and if you own an original Fiend Folio, you can see that it came up quite often in my “Let’s Convert the Fiend Folio” series of posts.

AL: Gricks are listed as Neutral, and Quetzalcoatlsghost went along with that, but there is no way I am not going Chaotic here.

Crit: Following the table on page 385 of the core rulebook, we get a result of M/1d8. We can choose not to follow the table – or even make up a unique crit chart if a creature warrants it – but we do not need to do so here.

Put altogether, our DCC grick statblock looks like this:

Grick: Init +2; Atk tentacle +3 melee (1d4+2) or bite –2 melee (bite 1d6+1), AC 16; HD 2d8; MV 30’ or climb 20’; Act 4d20; SP +10 stealth, half damage from non-magical senses, scent-based senses effective to 300’ range; SV Fort +0, Ref +2, Will +5; AL C; Crit M/1d8.

The important thing to note here is that, although Quetzalcoatlsghost and I have slightly different takes on the creature, our conversions both share more than a little of the same DNA. Ultimately, which conversion a judge uses – if they do not make their own! – is a matter of taste. You shouldn’t be afraid of being “wrong” in your conversions. There is no “right” way or “wrong” way, just different ways based on what you like and what you want.

I am still hoping to get some other writers to share how they do conversions, so that you can see how their processes differ from my own. So far, people are shy!

Next: 3e 3PP: The Mysterious Tower

Conversion Crawl Classes 10: AD&D 2e: Swamplight

During the late era of 1st edition AD&D, the Dragonlance adventures (and, to a lesser degree, adventures like Ravenloft) set the scene for a different kind of large-scale storytelling. Adventures prior to Dragons of Despair had back stories, of course, but Dragonlance brought the PCs along for a ride where large-scale events were going to happen regardless of what the players decided to do. Dragonlance provided the thrill of a larger narrative, where both the DM and the players were discovering “the story” as it was revealed with each module released, and I think that there will always be a place for adventures set up in this manner…but it did lead the next edition away from “Here is the situation; let’s find out what happens” far too deeply toward “Here is the situation, and here is what is supposed to happen.”

At the same time, Dragonlance taught TSR that there was a lot of money to be made in selling setting materials as well as adventures. The World of Greyhawk was, of course, the baseline setting for 1st edition, but there was an expectation that most DMs were going to create their own worlds. Modules tended to be more modular, in that they could be placed in any world with only minimal changes. By the time the new edition rolled out, adventures became more tied into setting lore – even when the setting didn’t tie directly to the adventure itself. Forging these ties sold more products, in the same way as comic cross-over events sell more comics.

Finally, the human-centric world of earlier D&D was giving way to a fantasy game where PCs might be not just humans and demi-humans, but a great many types of humanoids. One might argue that the minotaurs of Dragonlance were influential here as well, but having drow and duergar PCs in the original Unearthed Arcana opened that door for others to follow. While 2nd edition did not go as far down this road as subsequent editions, some of the weird fantasy vibe of the earlier game was lost to treating monsters as simply part of the fantasy milieu – subjects for natural histories and anthropological studies rather than creatures inimical to human (and demi-human) civilizations.

Consequently, while 2nd edition adventures are statically as easy to convert as 1st edition modules, the structure of the adventures themselves require more work. It is not that there is anything wrong with lizardmen being set up by other monsters, or with an adventure where lizardmen are relatively peaceful if left alone. An adventure where said lizardmen are set up by rakshasas, which punishes players failing to take the “correct” course of leaving the lizardmen alone, is a bit of a challenge once you step away from 2nd Edition assumptions.   

This era of the game is also, shall we say, a bit railroad-y. To wit:

It is up to the PCs whether they agree to aid Chala. If they appear indecisive, Vant suggests that Chala is only the beginning – other cities in the area will be visited by disaster as Tefnut’s rage grows. He says even adventurers such as themselves will not be safe. It is better to right the situation now.

Chalans come forth and plead with the PCs to help their cause, promising the player characters what wealth they have stored away in their homes.

Eventually, the PCs should agree. In the event they do not, the rakshasas may disguise themselves as lizard men and attack or kidnap the PCs.

It is up to the PCs. But, if they don't decide the way you want, decide for them. It is this sort of thing which led certain individuals to argue that even including a module perforce meant you would railroad your players.

Fixing the Story

There is great potential here, but first we have to fix the story. There is a mystery; we must make sure that the players have the chance to realize that things are not as they seem. Instead of trying to drive the narrative into “Heroic adventurers save the Chala and the lizardmen!” we can bring the adventure right back to the game’s Sword & Sorcery roots by making the idol of Tefnut the prize and being relatively indifferent to the fate of human city, lizardman village, and rakshasa encampment alike.

The first step might be to replace the lizardmen with more technologically primitive humans. Suddenly, the PCs have a motive to talk to them. More, if they are captured, the PCs will not be eaten in a lizardman feast, and might even get a chance to learn something before they escape. The idol becomes the prize – whether it remains in the “lizardman” village, is returned the Chala, or is taken by the PCs to melt down or sell as treasure becomes the players’ decision (if they can recover it). Stealth, magic, diplomacy, or brute force might be used.

The idea that a god pays attention to what occurs around their idol is great, and is certainly in keeping with Sword & Sorcery fiction, but let’s not be subtle about it. Instead of slowly debilitating characters, let’s go with something dramatic. Rains and flooding come directly to mind considering the god involved. There might be some loss of Luck involved because this is, after all, DCC.

Speaking of thematic appropriateness, let’s fix the inclusion of an Egyptian god, Indian demons, and generic lizardmen. You can go any way you want with this, but I think that the Egyptian theme fits in well with a great swamp. The “lizardmen” can then be human worshipers of Sobek (the Egyptian crocodile god), which both accept Tefnut (after the miraculous appearance of his idol) and Sobek. Captured PCs are to be ritualistically fed to the sacred crocodiles at the new moon (to give them time to escape in Tarzan- or Conanesque fashion). We’ll make the rakshasa demons of Set, which is a lot stronger thematically to my mind. That this means we can use a Lawful, a Neutral, and a Chaotic god our divine wrangling is icing on the cake!

Dealing With Treasure

As with earlier editions, we want to remove unnecessary and/or bland magic items. Some magic items appear only to make certain parts of the story possible – the rakshasa might need boots of varied tracks to leave misleading footprints; we can just give that ability to our demons of Set. Monetary rewards should be reduced to 10%. Gold becomes silver, silver becomes copper, and so on. We could choose to halve the value of Tefnut’s idol and it is still an amazingly rich prize!

Let’s go back to story considerations for a minute, because Chala should not be showing off this valuable chunk of metal to all and sundry. Nor should the Chalans be encouraging every ne’er-do-well with a sword to go after that idol. After all, there is no reason to believe they will return with it. Instead, let us create a few rival parties of Chalans to be seeking the idol. Let’s have the Chalans discourage the PCs from pursuing the idol as a local matter (although the judge makes sure the players know the idol’s value).

Hazards

There are a number of hazards in the blackwater swamp which can be converted. It should be noted that a judge doesn’t need to use the same mechanics for quicksand or bogs in all adventures. Sometimes, a mechanic can be specific to the unique conditions of an adventure location. Lightning sand in the fire swamp does not have to follow the same rules as quicksand in blackwater swamp.

I mention this because there might be an impulse to scour DCC adventures, looking for the “correct” way to stat out a hazard. The goal here, unless you are being paid for your work, should be to convert without undue work. For instance, take this hazard from Swamplight:

Bogs in the swamp range from 4 to nine 9 feet deep (1d6+3). Characters who fall in a bog might or might not be submerged based on the depth of the bog. They must roll an Intelligence check at -3 on 1d20 (rangers pass this check automatically). Failure means the character has panicked and must be rescued. Characters who are successful with the saving throw can attempt to swim to safety at a -3 proficiency penalty because of the weeds and roots. Characters can be rescued with the methods suggested under “quicksand.” Characters who are submerged or who cannot swim can hold their breaths for one-half their Constitution score rounded up before they are considered drowned. Characters in heavy armor or who are heavily loaded down cannot swim in a bog.

In DCC terms, this might look like:

Bogs are 1d6+3’ deep. PCs who fall into a bog must attempt a DC 10 Intelligence check (characters without appropriate “outdoorsy” occupations roll on 1d10). Success allows a DC 10 Strength check to swim to safety (armor check penalty applies), but failure means the character must be rescued. If the bog is deep enough to submerge trapped characters, they suffer 1d3 temporary Stamina damage each round until rescued or they drown. This temporary damage is fully healed with 10 minutes of rest and unobstructed breathing.  

Monsters

Most of the monsters in this adventure are already converted in the DCC core rulebook, which will make things easier when converting the adventure. The judge may wish to replace some creatures with more thematically appropriate (Egyptian) ones, or reskin existing monsters to make them fit better. Some of these monsters originated in the Fiend Folio. You can find conversions of the algoid and fog giant in this blog.  

Converting monsters from 2nd edition Dungeons & Dragons is very similar to converting monsters from 1st edition. The biggest change is that 2nd edition monsters now include THAC0 in their statblock. THAC0 means “To Hit Armor Class 0”, which is equivalent to 20 in DCC. So, one can use 20 minus THAC0 to determine a monster’s base attack bonus.

For this module, the obvious monsters to convert are the rakshasas, which we are going to make into demons of Set. In Swamplight, they are given these stats:

Rakshasa (3): AL LE; AC -4; MV 15; HD 7; hp 35,38,42; THAC0 13; #AT 3; Dmg 1-3/1-3/2-5; SA Illusions, spells; SD +1 or better weapon to hit; ML 15; XP 4,000 each.

Rakshasa #1 wizard spells: enlarge, grease, protection from good, spider climb

Priest Spells: cure light wounds, entangle, faerie fire

Rakshasa #2 wizard spells: dancing lights, protection from good, spook, ventriloquism, detect invisibility, invisibility, whispering wind, fly

Priest spells: cure light wounds x2, invisibility to animals

Rakshasa #3 wizard spells: burning hands, color spray, detect magic, magic missile, blur, fog cloud, web, hold person, suggestion

Priest spells: entangle, pass without trace, protection from good

Before breaking this creature down into a DCC statblock, let’s jump over to the Purple Sorcerer Demon Generator and create 10 Type II demons. We are creating 10 because we want a 7 HD demon for a baseline (to match the rakshasa’s Hit Dice). What I came up with is:

Lion, Horse, Clay Demon (Type 2)

Init +2; Atk Constriction +7 melee (1d6+2) ; AC 14; HD 7d12 (37hp); MV 30'; Act 2d20; SP Drain ability score +6; Drain blood +6, Drain blood +6 Target Save 18, demon traits; SV Fort +6, Ref +5, Will +8, AL C.

Traits: Horns, Antennae

Standard Type 2 Demon Features

Communication: Speech, ESP (read minds but not converse)

Abilities: Infravision, darkness (+8 check)

Immunities: Immune to non-magical weapons or natural attacks from creatures of 3 HD or less; half-damage from fire, acid, cold, electricity, gas

Projection: Can teleport back to native plane or any point on same plane, as long as not bound or otherwise summoned

Crit Threat Range: 19-20

I cannot overstate the value of using free tools like this. Even though we are looking for a very specific thing, it is incredibly useful to have a baseline creature to look at…especially when converting demons, dragons, and the like.

Now that we have some idea where we are coming from, we can look at the statblock in DCC terms:

Init: No Init bonuses are supplied in our original monster, so we will use the +2 from the sample demon.

Atk: Our rakshasas attack with two claws and a bite. From their THAC0, we know that the base attack bonus should be +7 (20 minus a THAC0 of 13). This is right in line with our sample demon, so we are good to say “claw +7 melee (1d3) or bite +7 melee (1d4+1) or spell.”

AC: 2nd edition D&D still uses descending AC, and the easiest conversion is still 20 subtract the given AC. In this case, we would get AC 24, and our sample demon is AC 14. I think it would be fair to use an average AC of 19.

HD: The listed HD is 7, which is indicated 7d8 in AD&D 2e. In DCC, this becomes 7d12.

Hp: 7d12 yields 7 to 84 hp, with an average of 42 hp. The original creatures have 35, 38, and 42 hp. 7d8 would have yielded an average of 28 hp, so our rakshasas were above average as originally presented. I am going to give each one +6 hp, so they are 41, 44, and 48 hp.

MV: The 15 MV in AD&D 2e is faster than a human’s speed of 12, so I will give our demons of Set a MV of 40’.

Act: The original had three attacks, so 3d20 seems appropriate.

SP: In addition to our standard demon traits, our demons can take on the appearance of other humanoid creatures (including individuals). Let’s say that they can shift appearance using an action die. They can also cast spells, so we need to think about that. The three original creatures had different spellcasting abilities, so we might as well make our demons of Set have variable spellcasting as well. Do we need to cast wizard and cleric spells? That seems like overkill to me, so we can just say “Casts spells as a level 1d4+1 wizard with an additional +2 bonus to the spell check”.

SV: The original creature doesn’t really help us here, but the sample demon has Fort +6, Ref +5, Will +8. We can swap Fort and Ref because our demons are a bit snake-like themselves.

AL: Rakshasas are Lawful Evil. In nine-alignment systems, it is easy to peg Lawful Good and Lawful Neutral as Lawful. It is easy to peg Chaotic Neutral and Chaotic Evil as Chaotic. Neutral is, of course, Neutral. All other alignments have some wiggle room, and I am going to make our demons Chaotic. First off, that matches demons normally in the core rules. More importantly, it follows the Tefnut = Lawful, Sobek = Neutral, Set = Chaotic that I had pointed out before.

Crit: Following the table on page 385 of the core rulebook, we get a result of DN/1d8.

Put altogether, our DCC statblock looks like this:

Demons of Set (3): Init +2; Atk claw +7 melee (1d3) or bite +7 melee (1d4+1) or spell, AC 19; HD 7d12; hp 41, 44, 48; MV 40’; Act 3d20; SP demon traits (converse with ESP; infravision 90’; cast darkness with +8 spell check; immune to non-magical weapons or natural attacks from creatures of 3 HD or less; half-damage from fire, acid, cold, electricity, gas; can teleport back to native plane or any point on same plane unless bound or otherwise summoned; crit range 19-20), illusions (can use action die to appear as any humanoid, including individuals), spellcasting (as level 1d4+1 wizard with additional +2 bonus to spell check); SV Fort +5, Ref +6, Will +8; AL C; Crit DN/1d8.

Demon 1 (CL 3, +5 spell check): charm person, chill touch, mending, spider climb, patron bond/invoke patron (Set), and shatter.

Demon 2 (CL 2, +4 spell check): animal summoning, flaming hands, read magic, ropework, spider climb, and patron bond/invoke patron (Set).

Demon 3 (CL 2, +4 spell check): comprehend languages, Ekim's mystical mask, magic missile, sleep, and patron bond/invoke patron (Set).

I would use Set-Utekh the Destroyer from Angels, Daemons, & Beings Between as a reasonable stand-in for Set.

Conclusion

This is a 16-page adventure in 34 pages (including maps). This is not the fault of the author; like wearing an onion in your belt, it was the style of the time. Although it may seem that I am looking down on the adventure, I am not. This would be a great adventure converted well to DCC. The rallying cry of 3rd Edition (“Back to the dungeon!”) came about at least partly in response to the criticisms I have made here about 2nd Edition, but that doesn’t mean that you can’t strip any 2nd Edition module back to its core elements. It just takes a little more work.

Next: D&D 3rd Edition: The Forge of Fury

Yngwie Malmsteen: Trilogy

It’s been a while since I’ve done an album cover post, but the DCC RPG Rocks! group on Facebook has a post linking to an article about “The 50 most hilariously ugly rock and metal album covers ever”.  One of these is the cover for Yngwie Malmsteen’s album, Trilogy. There are, fittingly, three elements on the cover to stat up: the three-head dragon, the guitar, and the doomed hero. I am not certain whether or not the guitar is shooting flames, or merely acting as a shield against the dragon’s fiery breath. We will take these elements one at a time.

Polydor (Large three-headed dragon): Init +15; Atk Claw +16 melee (1d8 plus snatch), bite +16 melee (1d12), or tail slap +16 melee (1d20); AC 25; HD 15d12; hp 90 (30 hp per head); MV 60’ or fly 120’; Act 6d20 plus 1d20 (spells); SP see below; SV Fort +15, Ref +15, Will +15; AL C; Crit DR/2d16.

Breath Weapon: Line of fire 10’ wide and 3d6 x 10 long, 3/day, damage equal to Polydor’s current hp, Reflex save DC 25 for half.

Spells: 1d20+4 for spell check: Color spray.

Hypnotic Stare: Polydor can hypnotize targets with its gaze using an action die (Will DC 25 or stand stupefied as long as the dragon holds its gaze).

Snatch: On a successful claw attack, Polydor snatches a target, which takes 1d6 crushing damage each round thereafter. Polydor can fly with a snatched creature, and drop it from any height (1d6 per 10’ falling damage), but cannot attack with a claw used in the snatch attack. Snatched creatures can attempt to escape with a DC 25 Strength check.

Dive Bomb Attack: When fighting from the air, Polydor’s first round of claw and bite attacks receive an additional +4 attack bonus and +d8 damage.

Three-Headed: Polydor’s three heads can fight independently, and have their own hit point totals, as does a hydra. As a result, Polydor has three action dice for bite attacks.

Gust of Wind: Polydor can use her wings once per day to generate a powerful hurricane-strength wind, blowing in a single direction in cone shape up to 100’ wide at termination. Creatures must succeed in a DC 25 Strength check or be blown backward 150’, taking 15d4 damage.

The Instrument of Malmsteen: This artifact has taken many appearances throughout its long existence, and can manifest as a musical instrument of any type. It has the ability to rebound any one attack or spell on the attacker (or caster) once per round with a successful DC 10 Personality check. The Instrument of Malmsteen is indestructible, and can be used as a +1 weapon doing 1d7+1 damage whatever form it takes.

The Instrument of Malmsteen can only bond with one user at a time, and it takes 1 week of practice with it as a musical device, plus a successful DC 15 Personality check to bond with the Instrument. Once a user has bonded, if the owner allows another to bond with the Instrument, it will never again bond with them. However, once bonded, the owner can choose to gain warrior or wizard levels each time they reach the next XP requirement to level up (see Big Damn Heroes), essentially becoming a bard. The owner could have any class prior to bonding (including a race-class), thus allowing the owner to have three classes. Class levels gained in this way are not lost if the bond is broken, but the former owner can thereafter only progress in their original class. Manifestations of spells gained while bonded with the Instrument of Malmsteen always have a musical component.

The Doomed Hero (Thief 2, Warrior 1, Wizard 3): Init +2; Atk Instrument of Malmsteen +1d3+1 melee (1d7+1d3+1); AC 11; HD 2d6 + 1d12 + 3d4; hp 31; MV 30’; SP thief skills, 1d3 Deed Die, 1d4 Luck Die (12 Luck), spells; SV Fort +3, Ref +4, Will +3; AL L; Crit III/1d12.

Languages: Common, Thieves' Cant, Chaos, Eagle.

Thief Skills: Backstab +1, Sneak Silently +6, Hide In Shadows +4, Pick Pocket +6, Climb Sheer Surfaces +6, Pick Lock +4, Find Trap +4, Disable Trap +4, Forge Document +6, Disguise Self +0, Read Languages +2, Handle Poison +0, Cast Spell From Scroll (1d12+1 or as wizard)

Spells (+4 to Spell Check): Animal summoning, cantrip, chill touch, flaming hands, magic missile, mending, and forget.

The Doomed Hero bears the Instrument of Malmsteen and has a +1 bonus to Personality checks.

You can listen to the full album here.

Free RPG Day

 

1193 Bloor St W, Toronto, ON M6H 1N4

Conversion Crawl Classes 9: AD&D: White Plume Mountain (3): Whelm, Wave, and Blackrazor

We’ve talked about the wilderness map, and we’ve talked about the adventure, but what people really remember about this module (apart from Dragotha) are the three magical weapons, Whelm, Wave, and especially Blackrazor. In Dungeon Crawl Classics, we are advised that every magic weapon is unique, so these three will fit right in. Or they will as soon as we convert them!

I think it might be a little advantageous to talk about why I am doing this series of posts. I own a lot of gaming material. I imagine many of you do as well, One of the questions I see come up consistently is "How do I convert X to Dungeon Crawl Classics?" It makes sense. DCC is a great game, but there have also be a lot of great adventures over the decades, both for various forms of Dungeons & Dragons and for other systems.

These posts are not intended to be me converting this material for you. Rather, they are intended to provide some reference points which allow you to convert anything you wish  as quickly and painlessly as possible.

There is also the possibility that you might be a publisher or writer looking at converting your own material. If this helps, at all, in creating a better conversion, then I will be rewarded by the result. Similarly, if a publisher does a substandard conversion, this material may help you, the reader, adjust that conversion to make the most out of the material presented.

Whelm

Whelm is described in White Plume Mountain thusly:

Whelm, a lawful neutral hammer +3 (+5 for dwarves), intelligence 15, ego 18. Purpose: kill all trolls, giants and goblin-types (including bugbears and hobgoblins). It can be thrown and will return from up to 150' thrice per day (dwarves only). It also acts as a hammer of stunning: once per day, when struck upon the ground, it will send forth a shock wave stunning up to 45 hit points of enemies up to a distance of 60' for 1-4 rounds if they fail to save vs. spells. Whelm also detects gold, gems, and the presence of goblins. A drawback is that the bearer of this weapon will come under the influence of a severe case of agoraphobia (fear of wide, open places), and will fight at -2 when not inside a building, at night, or (best of all) underground. Whelm is obviously a dwarven weapon.

As we discussed in the previous post, Lawful Neutral translates to Lawful, Neutral translates to Neutral, and Chaotic Neutral translates to Chaotic. We can safely conclude that Whelm will be Lawful, and we conveniently have one weapon tied to each of the DCC alignments. That dwarves favor Law, and Whelm is a dwarven weapon, fits very nicely.

Overall, Whelm is not too powerful, but some of the hammer’s powers need to be reworked to mesh with DCC.

Whelm, +3 Lawful warhammer

Intelligence: 15

Communication: The original write-up doesn’t supply us with much information here, but Table 8-4 on page 367 of the core rulebook would suggest speech, telepathy, or both. In this case, I will go with  speech and telepathy to make Whelm consistent with Wave and Blackrazor.

Special Purpose: Kill trolls, giants, and goblinoids

Power 1: When wielded by a dwarf, Whelm gains an additional +2 to attack rolls and damage, and can be thrown up to 150’, returning to the dwarf’s hand immediately thereafter.

Power 2: Once per day, the wielder can strike the ground, sending out a shock wave that stuns all enemies within 60’, rendering them unable to for 1d4 rounds. Fort DC 15 negates.

Power 3: The wielder can smell gold and gems as a dwarf. The wielder also gains the ability to sense goblinoid creatures within 100’.

Curse: Wielder suffers severe agoraphobia, and has a -1d penalty to all attack rolls, spell checks, and skill checks when outside during daylight hours. This curse is not in effect when inside a building, at night, or (best of all) underground.

Wave

Wave, a neutral trident +3 which does 1-10 hit points of damage. 14 intelligence, 20 ego. Purpose: death or disfigurement to all who won't convert to the worship of Poseidon (or any similar sea-god you choose). Powers:

Functions as a trident of fish commanding (as the miscellaneous magic item in DUNGEON MASTERS GUIDE)

Functions as a trident of warning (as the miscellaneous magic item in Dungeon Masters Guide)

Finds water

Confers water-breathing and underwater action abilities upon bearer

Confers cube of force ability (as the miscellaneous magic item in Dungeon Masters Guide)

Possesses speech and telepathy (in the common tongue as well as the languages of all sea creatures).

Dehydrates: On a natural roll of 20, in addition to its normal damage, Wave dehydrates its opponent, draining one-half of his or her remaining hit points (compute normal damage first).

This one is a bit stranger in that its cube of force power seems a bit off-theme. Nonetheless, it is easily enough converted to DCC terms. In this case, we also need to keep in mind the DCC magic system, and we will allow a spell check for force manipulation. Pelagia is the core neutral sea goddess, so we will replace Poseidon with her. Wave might look like this in DCC terms:

Wave, +3 Lawful trident (as polearm)

Intelligence: 14

Communication: Speech and telepathy (Common and languages of all sea creatures).

Special Purpose: Kill or disfigure all those refusing to convert to the worship of Pelagia.

Power 1: Wielder can breathe water indefinitely, and being in water causes no penalty to movement, attacks, spell checks, etc.

Power 2: Wielder can sense large amounts of water (at least 10 gallons) within 500’.

Power 3: Wielder cannot be surprised while holding the trident.

Power 4: Wielder can telepathically control up to 2d6 + level HD of fish or other marine creatures for 1d3 turns 3 times each day.

Power 5: Wielder can cast force manipulation through the trident using 1d20+4 for the spell check.

Power 6: When scoring a critical hit, in addition to all other effects (and after normal damage plus critical effects are resolved), Wave dehydrates its target to half its remaining hit points, rounded down.

Importantly, I did not crack open the Dungeon Master’s Guide to determine how to convert these powers. Instead, I used the existing text from White Plume Mountain to extrapolate a conversion that both captured a sense of the original, and was DCC-ified. This is going to be more important as we look at more esoteric conversions – you do not need the core rules for Traveller, MERP, or Twilight 2000 to convert an adventure. You need to understand the gist of what you are reading, and you need to understand DCC. Or even what you want to do in DCC.

Blackrazor

Blackrazor, a chaotic neutral sword +3, intelligence 17, ego 16. Purpose: to suck souls. It is a black sword that shines like a piece of night sky filled with stars, and it is sheathed in a black scabbard decorated with pieces of cut obsidian. On a killing stroke, Blackrazor temporarily adds the number of levels of the dead foe to its bearer's levels (in terms of fighting ability). The bearer also temporarily gains the full hit points of the victim. All subsequent damage to the sword's wielder is removed from the added hit points first. The extra levels and hit points last a number of turns equal to the number of levels received. The souls of all entities killed by Blackrazor are sucked out and devoured; those killed by the black sword cannot be raised.

For every three days the sword remains “unfed”, its ego increases by one point, until it can compel its bearer to kill a human or humanoid being. Upon feeding, its ego returns to 16. The DM will note that Blackrazor is a negative-energy entity that exists by absorbing positive life energy levels from those it kills. However, if it even strikes a negative-energy being like an undead (except for ghouls and ghosts), it will work in reverse, transferring one level and corresponding hit points from the wielder to the creature attacked. lt will do this each time that it strikes. Under these conditions, the wielder can actually die and have his soul sucked out by his own sword. If the wielder survives, he will need a restoration spell or twice the usual number of levels received from positive “kills” to replace the lost levels. Those killed for replacement must be of the same race as the sword-wielder. Blackrazor (and you, the DM) may very well keep this little drawback a secret until the first time the sword bites into a wight or a vampire. The DM must remember that Blackrazor exists solely to feel power and souls coursing through itself, and sometimes it may not be too picky about where the energy is coming from.

In addition to the above, the sword has the following powers:

Speech and telepathy (common and whatever tongues its wielder knows, which it learns telepathically)

Detects living creatures (souls), 60' r.

Haste spell (bearer only, 10 rounds}, once per day

100% magic resistance to charm and fear (exact percentage chance of resistance will depend on the level of the opponent casting such a spell)

Blackrazor, +3 Chaotic longsword

Intelligence: 17

Communication: Speech and telepathy.

Special Purpose: Consume souls.

Power 1: Suck Souls: When a living opponent is slain by Blackrazor, the sword consumes that beings soul, adding the victim’s hit points to its wielder equal for 1d3 turns. During this time, any damage to the wielder is removed from the temporary hit points first. The souls of all entities killed by Blackrazor are devoured and forever gone; those killed by the black sword cannot be returned to life by any means. A creature reduced to 0 hp by this ability cannot be magically healed, and cannot be saved by recovering the body.

Power 2: The sword senses all living beings, including those which are hidden or invisible, within 60’, and can communicate their presence to its wielder.

Power 3: The wielder gains a +6 bonus to all mind-affecting spells and effects, except those caused by Blackrazor itself (see below).

Curse 1: If Blackrazor is not fed for three days, it will force its wielder to make a Will save or be dominated. If the save is failed, Blackrazor takes over the dominated wielder completely for 2d6 rounds, and it attempts to consume as many souls as possible during this time. The initial DC is 20, but this raises by +1 for each day that the sword has not consumed a soul, and the sword can attempt to dominate its wielder once every 1d3 days after the initial three-day period.

Curse 2: Whenever Blackrazor strikes an un-dead foe, it consumes part of its wielder’s soul and transfers it as energy to the target. The wielder suffers 1 HD damage (1d12 for a warrior, 1d6 for a thief, and so on), and the target gains the same number of hit points. If the wielder is reduced to 0 hp in this manner, their soul is devoured and they are forever dead with no chance of recovery.

The reader will note that I have toned down Blackrazor a bit, but not much. Adding a level of fighting ability in DCC is not only overkill, but it is a logistical nightmare…especially as DCC tops out at 10 levels. Even adding a +1 bonus per X HD killed would be a bit much, and what would this mean for a warrior or a dwarf? Does their Deed Die increase? I frankly decided that trying to answer these questions wasn’t worth the gain. Or, for that matter, the increased complexity that I would be handing the prospective judge using this material.

Next: AD&D 2nd Edition: Swamplight

Conversion Crawl Classes 8: AD&D: White Plume Mountain (2): The Adventure

If great adventures start with great stories, as we have discussed before, the base story of White Plume Mountain might prove difficult for modern audiences. Essentially, the wizard Keraptis steals three magical weapons (Whelm, Wave, and Blackrazor) and then taunts adventurers into entering his funhouse dungeon in order to recover them. A good setup for a tournament, maybe, and certainly a good setup for someone just trying to show Gary Gygax what he could do, but the “mad wizard” trope is a little thin these days, and we might want to make adjustments.

Now, the module itself is clearly a wizard testing the PCs, and the adventure would have to be substantially rewritten in order to change this. This seems, to me, to be a lot more effort than it is worth, and would remove the charm of the adventure as it is written. A better way would be to introduce some greater purpose to the challenge.

The one encounter in the module that I find truly wrong is the final (possible) encounter:

If a party should succeed in obtaining two or even three of the magical weapons and is finally leaving for good, they may be stopped at 2 by the return of the force wall. A voice will speak to them out of the air: “Not thinking of leaving, are you? You've been so very entertaining, I just couldn't think of letting you go, especially with those little collector's items of mine. And since you've eliminated all of their guardians, why, you'll simply have to stay . . . to take their places. I'll have to ask you to leave all of your ridiculous weapons behind and let Nix and Nox escort you to the Indoctrination Center. I'll be most disappointed if you cause me any trouble and Nix and Nox have to eliminate you. Don't worry - you'll like it here.”

The thing I really dislike about this is:

Of course, this whole episode can be omitted if the party has already taken too much damage. Conversely, if your players have had too easy a time of it, this can be made tougher by the addition of one or two more efreet (Box and Cox).

Effectively, this penalized players who do well, and lets those who do poorly off the hook. Let’s alter this to make the whole thing gel better with modern aesthetics and the DCC vibe. First off, we replace the wizard Keraptis with Yonaxis from The Tower of Faces (or vice versa, if you think Keraptis is the more flavorful name, as I do – you could also keep both wizards, with Yonaxis pretending to be Keraptis for this challenge…and perhaps a lich Keraptis who takes offense to this later). We can then change the final dialogue to:

“Not thinking of leaving, are you? You've been so very entertaining, I just couldn't think of letting you go, especially with those little collector's items of mine. And since you've eliminated all of their guardians, you have passed my little job interview. I'll have to ask you to let Nix and Nox escort you to my tower. I'll be most disappointed if you cause me any trouble and Nix and Nox have to eliminate you. Don't worry – you are in no danger, and might even be able to keep those ridiculous weapons if you perform as well assisting me as you did against these challenges.”

Initial Considerations

As with any of these conversions, the first thing to do is reduce all treasure to about 10% of its total value, and then remove any unnecessary magical items (either removing them entirely or turning them into exceptionally well-crafted but non-magical goods). Those items we do retain we want to align with the DCC aesthetic, making them more mysterious and flavorful.

For example, there is a ring of flying with 4 charges in Area 4 – a particularly useful item given some of the challenges in this module. To make it work in DCC, let’s give it a description (“this iron ring is shaped to resemble a bat, roosting on the finger of its wearer with outspread wings. Its face is toward the fingernail, with two sharp fangs that cause some mild discomfort when the ring is put on or removed.”) and a bit more color than “4 charges” – The ring grants a fly speed of 30’, but when used the bat fangs pierce the wearer’s flesh and draw blood to power the flight. On the first round, this causes 1d4 Stamina damage. On the second round it causes 2d4, on the third round 3d4, and so on until either the wearer stops flying or reaches 0 Stamina and crashes to the earth. Now we don’t need to worry about charges; there is a high cost to using the ring itself.

Reworking Encounters

We also should look at the challenges presented in the module and see how they can be expressed in DCC terms. For instance, consider Area 7:

The door opens onto a stone platform in a large natural cave. The ceiling averages 50 feet above the level of the platform, while the floor of the cave, 50 feet below, is a deep pool of boiling mud. Points A and B mark the locations of geysers. Geyser A spouts once every five minutes. Geyser B spoutsonce every three minutes. Opposite the entrance platform is another stone platform, approximately 90 feet away. Between them a series of wooden disks is suspended from the ceiling by massive steel chains. The disks are about four feet in diameter, and three feet apart. Each disk is attached to its chain by a giant staple fixed in its center. The disks swing freely and will tilt when weight is placed upon them. The disks and chains, as well as the walls of the cavern, are covered with a wet, slippery algal scum that lives on the water and nutrients spewed up from the geysers. This coating gives off a feeble phosphorescent glow.

When the geysers erupt, they reach nearly to the roof of the cavern, and creatures holding onto the disks or chains may be washed off to fall into the mud below (an almost instant death). Characters with 18 strength, or better, have a 65% chance of holding onto the disk that is adjacent to an erupting geyser. For each strength point less than 18 there is a 10% lesser chance of hanging onto the disks (i.e., 16 strength equals 45% chance.) However, for each disk the character is located farther from the geyser, there is a cumulative chance 5% greater of holding on, i.e., one farther away (from the adjacent disk) equals +5%, two away equals +10%, etc. Damage varies as the distance from the geyser. Adjacent disk: 5-50 points; one away: 4-40, and so on: 3-30, 2-20, 1-10, 1-6, and 1-4 for anyone in the cavern. Characters who make their saving throw as vs. breath weapon will take only one half damage.

The elements we have to deal with here are (a) how often the geyser erupt, (b) moving from disc to disc, (c) chance of being swept off a disc or chain by the geysers, (d) damage, and (e) other means of crossing this room. Looking at them separately, we can determine that:

(a) In AD&D 1e, a round was 1 minute. Therefore, for our DCC challenge, the geysers erupt once every 5 rounds (geyser A) and once every 3 rounds (geyser B). We could randomize this element, in true DCC fashion, but part of the point of the challenge (as I read it) is to time your movements to minimize the effects of each geyser.

(b) Leaping from disc to disc is challenging because they swing. I would make this a DC 10 Strength check (armor check penalty applies) with a DC 15 Reflex save to catch oneself on a failure, and a DC 10 Strength check (again, armor check penalty applies) to pull oneself onto the disc if the Reflex save succeeds.

(c) Okay. An 18 Strength in DCC gives a +3 bonus, so a character with 18 Strength will succeed in a DC 10 Strength check 65% of the time. This gives us a great baseline, with a +1 bonus to the check for each disc away from the geyser. It is probably worthwhile to mark which disc(s) on the map count as adjacent for this purpose. It is extremely nice that this works well with the 5/10/15/20 DC system of DCC. I would not make armor check penalty apply.

(d) Crom on His Mountain, that’s a lot of damage! The save for half damage is vs. Breath Weapon, so we might say it is a Reflex save…DC 15 sounds fair. While I see no reason to change the damage here, we should probably determine the depth of the mud and the actual damage for falling in. After all, PCs might be able to use magic to survive! So, the discs are 50’ above the floor, but the floor is soft mud, so I might reduce damage to 3d6 for falling. Getting caught in the blast of a geyser is 10d10 damage, so we can up submersion in the mud to 12d12 and say that it has varying depth of (1d6+2) x 10’.

(e) The first time I encountered White Plume Mountain was as a player, and the DM at the time refused to consider my creative solutions to this encounter because they weren’t part of the text. Could I climb around the wall? Probably not the wisest or best course, but at least be ready to consider the possibility. This might also be a good place to use that ring of flying, if you found it.

Converting Monsters to DCC

I have already converted the entirety of the Fiend Folio on this blog, so you are swimming in examples of conversions from 1st edition AD&D. Here I will look at the conversion of a single monster step-by-step. I am choosing the giant crab in Area 17, in part from nostalgia, and in part because it shows a difference with the giant crab we converted from Zenopus’ Tower. Nostalgia because this was the most memorable encounter when I played the module. My magic-user had a cube of force, so we intentionally ruptured the “waterskin” walls, boiled the crab alive, and stayed safely in the cube. A ring of feather falling prevented our deaths when we, in the cube, rocketed out of the top of the volcano. It’s been over 40 years, and it still makes me chuckle.

In 1980, when White Plume Mountain was published, statblocks had made their appearance, but sometimes creatures were still being described in a more conversational tone. In this case, we are starting from:

After thirty feet the corridor widens out into a low. Dome-shaped area. Here lives the guardian of the treasure, just about the biggest giant crab (AC: 0, HD: 15, HP: 60; #AT: 2; D: 3-18) anyone's ever seen. On one of its "forearms" it wears a rune-covered copper band that protects it from all psionic-related spells (such as charm, fear, confusion, paralysis, magic jar, etc.) It also protects against all psionics. Unfortunately, it is worthless as a treasure. as the magic is keyed specifically to this particular monster.

Init: Nothing describes this giant crab as being particularly fast, and I am reminded of the stop-motion crabs created by the late great Ray Harryhausen for The Mysterious Island. The crab therein is relatively slow, so I would say -4 for initiative. This is also appropriate for the encounter, because while the crab won’t puncture the bubble membrane around it, the PCs may.

Atk: The crab attacks with two gargantuan claws doing 3d6 damage each. At 15 Hit Dice, it would have struck often using the AD&D attack matrixes, so we will just give it a +8 to its attack rolls. This might be low, but I think that it is fair.

AC: AD&D uses descending AC, whereas DCC uses ascending. The easiest conversion is 20 subtract the given AC, which grants an AC of 20. Done.

HD: Our giant crab has 15 Hit Dice, and in AD&D terms these would be eight-sided dice unless specifically listed otherwise. 15d8 is fine.

Hp: We can keep the 60 hp of the original creature. This will not always be the case for conversions; some systems (including WotC-era D&D) suffer serious hit point creep.

MV: In the encounter as written, the monster is largely stationary, and the author doesn’t appear to have considered a movement speed. Let’s say it can move 40’, and swim 30’. We are adding the swim speed because our gargantuan crab deserves to be encountered in other locations as well as in White Plume Mountain.

Act: The giant crab gets two attacks in AD&D, so in DCC it has 2d20 for Action Dice. Note that, if you wanted to make this monster even more horrendous, you could give it 2d24 and an extended crit range of 20-24, but that is probably overkill.

SP: We will note that the creature is immune to mind-affecting spells and abilities because of its rune-covered copper band. We will also note that the band is AC 22, requires 20 hp in a single attack to destroy, or may be destroyed with a successful attack on the crab and a Deed Die result of 5+.

SV: The shell is likely to help with Fort saves, but our crab is none too agile. In this case, Fort +10, and Ref -4. The crab attacks intelligently, so I am inclined to give it Will +4.

AL: Normally, a crab would be N, but this one has some level of intelligence. We don’t get to know what alignment the author would have given it, but we can examine the AD&D alignment system, at least briefly. AD&D uses a nine-point alignment system with a Good-Evil axis as well as a Lawful-Chaotic axis. Good vs. Evil seems to be the most important axis, with the Lawful-Chaotic axis describing their approach to good, evil, or neutral morality. You can assume that a Lawful Good or Lawful Neutral creature should be converted to Lawful in DCC, and that a Chaotic Neutral or Chaotic Evil creature translates to Chaotic. True Neutral converts to Neutral. Thereafter, things get murky.

When in doubt, go with your gut. A Chaotic Good character like Robin Hood might be considered Lawful in DCC, and a Lawful Evil devil might be Chaotic because it opposes an ordered universe. The terms “Law” and “Chaos” do not necessarily mean the same thing in DCC that they do in AD&D. In fact, I am going to make our crab Lawful because it is described as having some intelligence (at least in the way it attacks), and it sits in its bubble all day playing guard duty for Keraptis.

Crit: Following the table on page 385 of the core rulebook, we get a result of M/1d20.

Put altogether, our DCC gigantic crab statblock looks like this:

Gigantic Crab: Init -4; Atk gargantuan claw +8 melee (3d6); AC 20; HD 15d8; hp 60; MV 40’ or swim 30’; Act 2d20; SP Immune to mind-affecting spells and abilities while rune-covered copper band remains intact (Mighty Deed 5+ to destroy, or AC 22, 20 hp in a single attack); SV Fort +10, Ref -4, Will +4; AL L; Crit M/1d20.

Those Awesome Weapons

Wave, Whelm, and Blackrazor are iconic, and deserve a conversion post of their own. So let’s see what we can do. 

And now a word from our sponsor. I have mentioned my Patreon from time to time. A “tipping” membership is only $1. As of this writing, the last White Plume Mountain post has had 172 views, with the other posts in the Conversion Crawl Classes series having received as few as 212 or as many as 1,170 views. The blog as a whole has topped 1 million views.  Clearly, this stuff is of some use to somebody. If you are that somebody, please consider tipping. It would mean a lot to me. At the same time, these are hard times, so if you are going through hard times, ignore this.

Regardless, the three iconic weapons will be given a closer look in the next post. I was going to append them to this post, but they are complex enough that they deserve better!

 

Next: White Plume Mountain (3): Wave, Whelm, and Blackrazor!